Language Blog
Part One:
1. My conversation partner’s first language is French. He was born in Montreal, Canada. He has actively been speaking English for
about three years. He studied English in school, so he was proficient in
writing and reading English. However, he learned to speak English by immersing
himself in American culture. The first
part of the experiment went fairly easy.
He seemed to understand what I was communicating. The communication was slow and laborious with
many stops and starts. Words that asked, how or what were difficult to convey
with gestures.
2. As the conversation was proceeding with my partner, I
noticed that he was talking a little louder and his side of the conversation
was being conveyed in a simple manner. I felt he was talking to me as if I was
a child. My side of the conversation was necessarily simple. We have spoken
together in conversation many times and he never simplified his conversation
before.
3. The culture that
used spoken language definitely has the advantage. Voice inflection can convey a great deal in communicating.
Gestures are limited in conveying emotion and questions. Communicating complex ideas are very difficult
using only gestures. I found it almost impossible in our experiment. The culture that could use spoken language
might have an attitude that the person, who cannot speak, is ignorant. The
culture using the spoken language might convey frustration and impatience
towards the non speaking person. My
friend is learning signing or ASL. She has attended many gatherings with deaf
people. She has learned that deaf people
often are treated as if they are ignorant. Or they can be ignored because
communicating with them is often difficult. Many people who are able to speak
feel frustrated and impatient in communicating with the deaf. My husband is partially deaf and he sometimes
cannot follow a conversation in a crowd of people. He will excuse himself instead of participating,
because he is aware of the frustration people have when he cannot hear them
properly. Some people will refuse to
take the time involved for communication with a non-speaking person, or treat
the nonspeaking person as if they are stupid.
Part2
I had a very difficult time lasting the full fifteen minutes
using speech with no gestures or inflections in my voice. I had to start the
clock over many times because I messed up and used a gesture or inflection in
my voice. I naturally use inflection
when I speak, it was unnatural and required a great deal of concentration to
prevent myself from using facial expressions or gestures.
My partner had a difficult time following my
conversation. He stated that he did not
know at times, when I was asking a question or making a statement. He could not
understand if I was conveying humor or not.
This experiment proved to me that the non-spoken area of
communication is more important than the spoken portion of communication. I learned that most effective communication
between people happen with our body language and facial expressions. I believe that people with autism have a
difficult time in reading body language correctly and also blind people would
have a difficult time reading body language. It would be beneficial not to be able to read
body language in a culture that was a dictatorship and displaying facial
gestures could cause harm to yourself or your family. In this culture honest
communication would have to be hidden.
